The Delhi High Court has requested a response from Meta Platforms as well as the Centre on the misuse of Instagram’s copyright system against digital content creators. The notice was sent after the filing of a petition from Nitin Joshi, a content creator based in Noida, where he alleged that fake copyright infringement complaints were being lodged to have his original content taken down, as well as demand payment for its restoration.
As per the news sources, the matter has received publicity, as content creators now rely greatly on social media platforms such as Instagram for their source of income.
The copyright strike allegations
The public interest litigation (PIL) alleges that some people are exploiting the weaknesses in Meta’s copyright policy to make false claims against creators. As per the petition, original Instagram Reels are being misused through Facebook’s desktop tools and then reported as copyright strikes on Meta’s Rights Manager tool.
The entrepreneur and influencer Nitin Joshi, who has more than 1.6 million followers on Instagram and has created content on topics such as entrepreneurship, finance, branding, business strategy, and marketing. alleged that around 40 creators had faced similar issues
The petition was filed following the reach of his video titled “Instagram’s Biggest Copyright Scam” on 7 July. In the video, he discusses copyright scams and invites creators experiencing comparable challenges to get in touch with him. The petition notes that the video was subsequently blocked on a global scale due to a copyright report.

Why does the case matter for creators?
The issue of copyright protection is a serious matter for creators due to the value that original video, design, article, or educational content holds as business property. A wrong copyright strike may result in the removal of content, account restrictions, audience loss, and even financial losses.
In the petition, the request for better grievance handling was submitted, with human review of copyright disputes being suggested rather than automated systems used for copyright enforcement. The possible changes might affect social media platform policies regarding copyright issues.
Meta and court’s response
Meta’s legal team agreed that there could be misuse of online platforms and added that the company was willing to take steps to prevent them. The Centre also agreed that the issues mentioned in the petition require consideration, particularly the issue of safeguarding digital creators.
According to the Delhi High Court, the case is not just one single petition, and it includes concerns about the issues of digital extortion and misuse of the copyright enforcement system. The case can lead to establishing better guidelines in terms of copyright complaints, more grievance redressal, and better protection of digital creators who rely on Instagram for earning a living.

